Lesson 70 of 78 · People, Safety & Job Design
Risk Assessment, Safeguarding & Hazardous Energy
Safety is not a robot feature; it is a property of the complete application, task, people, environment, and lifecycle. ISO 10218-1:2025 addresses industrial robots 1; ISO 10218-2:2025 addresses integrated applications and cells 2.
Assess every lifecycle task
List transport, installation, setup, teaching, automatic production, material loading, inspection, cleaning, jam clearing, tool change, maintenance, troubleshooting, recovery, modification, and decommissioning. For each, identify crushing, impact, trapping, cutting, ejection, gravity, electrical, pneumatic/hydraulic, thermal, process, ergonomic, environmental, and unexpected-behavior hazards.
Estimate severity and likelihood using the organization’s accepted method, then reduce risk:
- eliminate or reduce hazard by design—lower energy, remove pinch geometry, limit travel, improve stability;
- apply guards, protective devices, safety-related control functions, safe distances, and validated stopping behavior;
- address residual risk through instructions, training, supervision, signs, and PPE.
OSHA’s robot chapter calls for application-specific risk assessment, controls, safeguards, procedures, training, and evaluation 3.
Collaborative operation
Collaborative methods can include safety-rated monitored stop, hand guiding, speed-and-separation monitoring, and power/force limiting. ISO/TS 15066 supplements collaborative application guidance 4. Tool, payload, fixture, contact geometry, speed, force, environment, and trapping remain part of the assessment.
Lockout/tagout
OSHA 1910.147 establishes minimum performance requirements for controlling hazardous energy during covered servicing and maintenance 5. Inventory electrical, gravity, spring, hydraulic, pneumatic, thermal, chemical, vacuum, and rotating energy. Shutdown commands and emergency stops are not necessarily energy isolation. Procedures must address isolate, lock/tag, dissipate or restrain, verify zero-energy state, perform work, inspect, restore, and notify under applicable rules.
Safety dossier
Create a lifecycle task-hazard matrix, risk-reduction record, safeguarding concept, safety-function list, validation plan, and energy-isolation map. Have a qualified safety professional and responsible employer review any real application; this course cannot certify a cell.
Source trail
References
- 1ISO 10218-1:2025 - Safety Requirements for Industrial Robots. International Organization for Standardization. 2025. verifiedCurrent safety requirements for the industrial robot as partly completed machinery. Cited at: robot scope.
- 2ISO 10218-2:2025 - Safety Requirements for Industrial Robot Applications and Robot Cells. International Organization for Standardization. 2025. verifiedCurrent requirements for integration, commissioning, operation, maintenance, decommissioning, and disposal of robot applications and cells. Cited at: application scope.
- 3OSHA Technical Manual, Section IV, Chapter 4 - Industrial Robot Systems and Industrial Robot System Safety. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 2021. verifiedRobot-system components, lifecycle hazards, risk assessment, safeguards, collaborative modes, training, evaluation, and applicable U.S. requirements. Cited at: risk reduction.
- 4ISO/TS 15066:2016 - Collaborative Robots. International Organization for Standardization. 2016. verifiedCurrent technical specification supplementing industrial-robot safety requirements for collaborative applications and work environments. Cited at: scope.
- 529 CFR 1910.147 - The Control of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout). Occupational Safety and Health Administration. verifiedU.S. general-industry minimum performance requirements for controlling unexpected energization, startup, and release of stored energy during service and maintenance. Cited at: standard purpose.
Further reading
- Center for Occupational Robotics Research. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. verifiedResearch on traditional, collaborative, mobile, wearable, autonomous, and other robots used by or near workers.
Check your understanding
- Which order best reflects the risk-reduction hierarchy?
- Inherently safe design then engineering safeguards then information procedures and PPE
- PPE then ignore design
- Training only
- Warning sign then higher speed
Remove or reduce hazards by design first, then apply protective measures, then address residual risk with information and organizational controls.
- When does hazardous-energy control become especially important?
- Servicing maintenance setup cleaning unjamming and intervention where unexpected startup or stored energy can injure
- Only normal office work
- Only design review
- Never for pneumatics
OSHA 1910.147 addresses unexpected energization, startup, and stored-energy release during covered service and maintenance.