Lesson 77 of 78 · Prove & Deliver
Verification, FAT, SAT & Commissioning
Verification proves requirements; validation proves the solution serves the intended work. Build the test matrix from the requirement IDs, not from whatever is easiest to demonstrate.
Evidence types
- inspection: identity, dimensions, workmanship, configuration, documentation;
- analysis: loads, margins, timing, heat, flow, capacity, uncertainty;
- simulation: logic, collision, trajectories, production variability, fault paths;
- component/subsystem test: uncertain physics and interfaces;
- FAT: integrated functions before site release;
- SAT: installed functions, utilities, interfaces, site hazards, and acceptance;
- performance qualification: representative mix over time with intended staffing.
NIST couples real and virtual testing with metrics and protocols 1. NIST also warns that digital models need verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification 2.
Test-case anatomy
State ID, requirement, preconditions, configuration, equipment, calibrated instruments, personnel/roles, procedure, data, expected result, acceptance threshold, stop criteria, restoration, and discrepancy handling. Preserve raw evidence.
Fault and recovery campaign
Test missing part, wrong part, sensor disagreement, jam, low pressure, drive fault, communications loss, power interruption, restart, full buffer, unavailable downstream, failed calibration check, and attempted invalid command. Use safe simulations or bounded methods; never create uncontrolled hazardous states.
Commissioning release
Use a punch list with severity. Define which items block shipment, power-on, automatic mode, personnel access, production, or final acceptance. Verify training, procedures, spares, backups, restoration, maintenance, safety validation, and ownership before release.
Gate 5
Pass when every critical requirement has accepted evidence, every high-severity discrepancy is closed, configuration matches the record, recovery is demonstrated, and responsible authorities approve release.
Source trail
References
- 1Robotic Systems for Smart Manufacturing Program. National Institute of Standards and Technology. verifiedMeasurement science, performance metrics, test methods, interoperability, planning, agility, and collaborative workcell integration. Cited at: test environments.
- 2Digital Twins for Advanced Manufacturing. National Institute of Standards and Technology. verifiedRequirements, synchronization, interoperability, verification, validation, uncertainty quantification, and trustworthy manufacturing twins. Cited at: VVUQ.
Further reading
- ISO 10218-2:2025 - Safety Requirements for Industrial Robot Applications and Robot Cells. International Organization for Standardization. 2025. verifiedCurrent requirements for integration, commissioning, operation, maintenance, decommissioning, and disposal of robot applications and cells.
- OSHA Technical Manual, Section IV, Chapter 4 - Industrial Robot Systems and Industrial Robot System Safety. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 2021. verifiedRobot-system components, lifecycle hazards, risk assessment, safeguards, collaborative modes, training, evaluation, and applicable U.S. requirements.
Check your understanding
- What is FAT?
- Factory acceptance testing before site delivery or final installation
- Final accounting total
- A material test only
- An unplanned demo
FAT verifies agreed functions and deliverables in the supplier or build environment before site acceptance.
- Why repeat relevant tests at SAT?
- Site utilities interfaces environment installation and configuration can change behavior
- FAT proves every site condition forever
- Shipping removes risk
- Tests are ceremonial
The installed system and interfaces must be proven in their real context.